DRUÅ½BA ZNANJA, EKONOMIJA ZNANJA, ZNANJE ZA VSE

Iz o TRAJNOSTNI WIKI SLOVENIJE

PriroÄnik

DRUÅ½BA ZNANJA, EKONOMIJA ZNANJA, ZNANJE ZA VSE
1. Informacijska druÅ¾ba in IKT (1. horizontalna prioriteta EPD ID)
2. Odprta druÅ¾ba, odprta drÅ¾ava, dobra uprava â€“ strukturiran dialog
3. Mladi (prihajajoÄa generacija, kreativni ljudje)
USTVARJALNOST IN INOVATIVNOST (EPD Ukrep 1.1 - Spodbujanje razvoja inovacijskih okolij)
1. Prenos tehnologij in znanj, tvegani kapital (Ukrep 1.1. EPD spodbujanje inovacijskih okolij)
PODJETNIÅ TVO IN KONKURENÄŒNOST (EPD 1. prednostna naloga EPD)
1. Na znanju temeljeÄa podjetja (v pripravi)
2. Intelektualna lastnina (Intangibles property, tacit knowledge)
TRAJNOSTNI RAZVOJ - Â»VLAK ZA XXI ST.Â« (temeljna paradigma strukturnih dokumentov RS)
1. AGENDA 21 - RIO 92 JOHANESBOURG 02 (promocija trajnostnega razvoja)
2. Razvoj druÅ¾be in skupnosti
3. Trajnostna energetika in okoljevarstvo - tehnologije za trajnostno gospodarstvo (horizontalne prioritete EPD)
ZNANJE, VSEÅ½IVLJENSKO UÄŒENJE, DRUÅ½BENA VEZLJIVOST, SOCIALNO VKLJUÄŒEVANJE, ENAKE MOÅ½NOSTI IN ENAKO OBRAVNAVANJE, DOBRA UPRAVA (from government to governance) - 2. prednostna naloga EPD - Znanje, ÄloveÅ¡ki viri)
1. UÄenje na daljavo, nove tehnologije
REGIONALNI RAZVOJ ESRR/ERDF - V sluÅ¾bi regij
1. Learning Regions R3L Iniciative
MEDNARODNI RAZVOJ IN MEDNARODNO SODELOVANJE

ZNANJE IN KREATIVNOST...UNESCO koncept DRUÅ½BE ZNANJA tj. HUMANE informacijske druÅ¾be; s Älovekom v srediÅ¡Äu ( 1. Principle of Sustainbility from Rio 92 in 10. preboj ( EU ) ICT Agende 2005 od dostopa za vse, do veÅ¡Äin za vse )

Razprava na prehodu v druÅ¾bo znanja mora vpoÅ¡tevati

vzporedne procese (mh):

prilagajanje na pravila igre v druÅ¾bi, ki temelji na znanju, uveljavljanje regionalnega razmiÅ¡ljanja in regionalizacija, vstop v programiranje regionalnega razvoja znotraj Evropske strukturne politike.

http://portal.unesco.org/en/TEMPLATE/img_s_unesco/events/60_71.jpg http://www.pina.info/~goran/trajnost/images/poweredby/essr_01.png ... knowledge societies â€œencompass broader social, ethical and political dimensions

In v l. 2005 premik paradigme: 10 preboj EU IKT Agende [1]' ( v EU od 2005 ; v RS M3C Slovenije; Älani seniorji, protagonisti oz. nosilci OSI internet programa - (advocating & implementing) - od 1994' - od prostega dostopa do IKT, do znanja in informacij za vse; from OPEN ACCESS to ICT, INFORMATION and KNOWLEDGE.

Sedem let pred strategijo; Strategija RS v informacijski druÅ¾bi (feb. 2003) smo omogoÄali ti. prost dostop (free access, free hosting,..) do IKT in Centrov za samostojno uÄenje; kot protagonisti OSI Internet programa v Sloveniji, - CIVILNA JAVNOKORISTNA NEPRIDOBITNA, KADROVSKA IN TEHNIÄŒNA INFRASTRUKTURA - ' in javni dostop' (Slovenska IKT, kulturna in civilna diagonala ).

V letu 2004 smo se skupno zdruÅ¾ili devet regionalnih MMC v neformalno M3C mreÅ¾o Slovenije. Letos (06), pa sestavlja slovensko M3C mreÅ¾o 15 regionalnih veÄnamenskih multimedijskih centrov - iz vseh statistiÄnih regij (12) v Sloveniji .

'Tudi s pomoÄjo ERDF/ESRR zastavljen in realiziran cilj - 100% pokritosti v RS 'oz. Prvi prioriteti Enotnega programskega dokumenta .

Kadrovsko in IKT (javno) infrastrukturo (, kot nvo/npos) - zagotavljajo najstarejÅ¡e organizacije Älanice M3C' preko 10 let,(?!)' ..V inovacijksem miljeju, kjer je DIALOG Å¡e zelo MLAD (vzpostavljen), KRHEK in nekako vedno (od vseh) bolj ob strani.

In kjer implementacijski deficit; igra svoj neobÄutljivi in polzavedni, vzroÄni ples absorbcijske (?) neozaveÅ¡Äenosti. "Gre na bolje."(06)

... Po filozofu, gospodu Tinetu Hribarju je najpomembnejÅ¡a lastnost v danaÅ¡njem Äasu ORIENTACIJA. Lahko pa sledi tudi izjemno vrednotena; KOORDINACIJA v multipolarnem diskursu, gotovo. Glede na nivo finanÄne podpore iz proraÄunskih virov NPO/NVOS smo na EU 24 mestu. Gotovo premalo in moÅ¾no Äimprej realnih izboljÅ¡av - Å¡e posebej ZA KOMPLEMENTARNE SEKTORJE. In nasproti veÄjim in konkretnim implementacijskim optimumom, ki jih (- nas NPO -) na enotnem evropskem tudi nepridobitnem trgu "Äakajo" na razpolago; EU vrednostne verige ( iz: EU budgetnih linij ). Miljarda evrov letno, onkraj bifurkativnih "digitalnih loÄnic". In res boljÅ¡a konkurenÄnost se komplementarno dopolnjuje tudi na podroÄju nepridobitnih civilnih javnokoristnih organizacij.

Na VSEevropskem nivoju;... v naÅ¡em primeru, doÅ¾ivlja svoj revivle, v l. 2005, 2006, 2007, 'druÅ¾beni oz. socialni razvoj'tudi na lokalnem nivoju ( The Budapest Declaration), ki naj tudi pomeni to, kar predstavlja Å¾e v naslovu;

The Building European Civil Society soc. razvoj- definicija

Building Civil Society through Community Development

povezava

Predvidena javna (programska) podpora za ti. community multimedia centres, veÄnamenske nepridobitne IKT (free access) centre je bila slovenska obveza (?!), Å¡e po starem UNESCO programu, Å¡e, ko smo glede na seznam OECD /DAC list, predstavljali deÅ¾elo v tranziciji (deÅ¾elo prejemnico mednarodne pomoÄi).

Program Zavoda za Odprto druÅ¾bo ti. Internet programme je za prejÅ¡nje obdobje, bil v pomoÄ (zapolnil vrzel in tvoril PODPORNO OKOLJE) javnokoristnim organizacijam v RS, ki so po odhodu mreÅ¾e in prenehanju delovanja OSI Slovenia (zaradi razvitosti RS) teÅ¾avno nadaljevale svoje POSLANSTVO.

ÄŒe si sposodimo nekaj dejstev za Merilo javne skrbi se tudi kaÅ¾e naslednje ;

Program PHARE ; (Slovenian) Civil Society Development Foundation Äeprav moÅ¾en, med 23 podroÄji PHARE, ni bil NIKOLI IZVEDEN. Vedno smo ostali BREZ ODGOVORA. Skoraj vedno.

Odpiranje odprtih vrat (NPO 2002) in procesov, ki so od Partnerstev "vraÄana" na dialog (Partnerstvo za okolje - na predlog PIC tudi vrnjen s Partensrstva na dialog... 2003 na MOP(+E)...v Äasu Vzpostavljanja dialoga in ti. VzorÄnega procesa na MOP(E) RS.

Spoznanja domaÄih strokovnjakov za evropsko in regionalno politiko oz. njih vpogledi v slovensko in novo evropsko strukturno politiko OPOZARJAJO, da smo v prihodnjih letih, kot izvajalci strukturnih in komunitarnih (EU) programov, v velikem delu predvidene in Å¾e danes poudarjene - nepridobitne civilne javnokoristne organizacije.

Razvoj civilnih javnokoristnih nepridobitnih organizacij je nesorazmeren drugim kazalcem, Å¡e iz slovenske tranzicijske stvarnosti in tu se je nadejati napredku "v sedanjem Äasu "- . Infrastrukturno.

Strategija NVO je napisana s strani doajena slovenskega projektnega managementa; dr. Hauca..., dovolj dober razlog za konkretno in zastvavljeno smer.

Smeri razvojne EU politike predpostavljajo ZNOTRAJ napredka malih in srednjih podjetij, tudi napredek: zdruÅ¾enj, kooperativ in meÅ¡anih podjetij "toliko", da imamo (EU!) v Generalnem direktoratu za mala in srednja podjetja (DG XXIII) tudi Social Economy Unit C3

UNESCOâ€™s concept of knowledge societies

http://portal.unesco.org/en/TEMPLATE/img_s_unesco/events/60_71.jpg

http://portal.unesco.org/en/TEMPLATE/img_s_unesco/new/60_en.jpg

UNESCOâ€™s concept of knowledge societies and the four underlying principles â€“ freedom of expression, quality education for all, universal access to information and knowledge, respect for cultural and linguistic diversity â€“ are now well accepted in the WSIS process.

(... Towards Knowledge Based Societies UNESCO Paris 9.Oct. 2003 )

Communique - Ministerial Round Table on "Towards Knowledge Societies"

(UNESCO Headquarters, 9 and 10 October 2003)

1. Knowledge societies must be based on universally recognized human rights, respect for privacy and human dignity, and solidarity of and among peoples. They must reflect high ethical and professional standards.

2. Building knowledge societies implies a commitment to the principles of democracy, transparency, accountability and good governance. This process must engage, and recognize the interdependency of, governments, the private sector and civil society. Lack of access to knowledge engenders marginalized and disadvantaged populations and hinders the participation of these populations in decision-making and the development process.

3. We are very concerned about growing inequalities in infrastructure development and in the access to and use of technologies. Our goal is to transform the digital divide into digital opportunity through digital solidarity.

4. Building knowledge societies is essential to achieving sustainability and future prosperity. Governments should thus reassess their development priorities in order to make the necessary investments in building knowledge societies.

5. We urge the international community to help the developing countries to build their capacity so that they can achieve self-reliance as soon as possible. To achieve this objective, we need to pay particular attention to the identification of possible mechanisms for the funding of this effort, including the setting up of a digital solidarity fund to augment national resources.

6. The following principles and parameters are essential for the development of equitable knowledge societies: â€¢ Freedom of expression â€¢ Universal access to information and knowledge â€¢ Respect for human dignity and cultural and linguistic diversity â€¢ Quality education for all â€¢ Investment in science and technology â€¢ Understanding and inclusion of indigenous knowledge systems.

...

NaÅ¡a druÅ¾ba se definira kot informacijska druÅ¾ba, druÅ¾ba v kateri so informacije poceni in v kateri so IKT v sploÅ¡ni uporabi, ali kot na znanju temeljeÄa druÅ¾ba... Najbolj dragocene so investicije v neoprijemljivo vrednost (intengibles) oz. ÄloveÅ¡ke vire in investicije v socialni kapital. KljuÄna dejavnika sta znanje in kreativnost...

Å tirje STEBRI EKONOMIJE ZNANJA

1. Education & Training( M3C S ) An educated and skilled population is needed to create, share and use knowledge.

2. Information Infrastructure( M3C S ) A dynamic information infrastructure-ranging from radio to the internet-is required to facilitate the effective communication, dissemination and processing of information. '3. Economic Incentive & Institutional Regime( M3C S ) A regulatory and economic environment that enables the free flow of knowledge, supports investment in Information and Communications Technology (ICT), and encourages entrepreneurship is central to the knowledge economy.

4. Innovation Systems ESRR/ERDF 2004-2005 1.4 gospodarska infrastruktura in javne (IKT) sluÅ¾be (op. OECD in socialne inovacije),

A network of research centers, universities, think tanks, private enterprises and community groups is necessary to tap into the growing stock of global knowledge, assimilate and adapt it to local needs, and create new knowledge.

One needs to reminisce about the past â€“ including more distant past, spanning several centuries â€“ if for nothing else, then in order to realize, at the outset of a new millennium, that history is happening at all times. ...Now, too, because of the three momentous processes coinciding today: the current phase of permanent globalization (Bordo, Eichengreen, Irwin 1999; Frankel 2001; Kolodko 2002a), the post-socialist transformation (Blanchard 1997; Lavigne 1999; Kolodko 2000a), and the modern scientific and technological revolution (Raymond 1999; OECD 2000; Payson 2000; Kolodko 2000d).

It is in this context that we should perceive modern developments, so as to avoid missing the train of progress once again. Not everyone succeeded in this task in the past: actually, few did. The same thing is being repeated now: some will get on the train, some will be left waiting, and some might even get pushed off the platform...

Non governmental organization and the government are olso part of the innovation sistem to the extent that they also produce NEW KNOWLEDGE STR. 7...

The Knowledge Economy KAM Methodology, World Bank

Towards Knowledge Societies clearly makes the distinction between knowledge societies and the information society. While the information society is based on technological breakthroughs, knowledge societies â€œencompass broader social, ethical and political dimensions.â€ The report focuses in particular on the foundations on which knowledge societies that will optimize sustainable human development are constructed.